Wednesday, July 1, 2020

2Nd AMMENDENT - Politics or Emotions?

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on 2nd AMMENDENT - Politics or Emotions?. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality 2nd AMMENDENT - Politics or Emotions? paper right on time.


Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in 2nd AMMENDENT - Politics or Emotions?, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your 2nd AMMENDENT - Politics or Emotions? paper at affordable prices !


Is this battle over the Second Amendment rights driven by emotions or politics or both? Are we strengthening our freedoms or weakening them over issues such as this? The nd Amendment was published in the Bill of Rights in September 178. It expressly states, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."


As you know, this is a very "hot" topic and has been for some time. Many people have interpreted this Amendment in many ways. They have made the claim that this is meant for military only, for people to protect themselves. It is difficult to figure out.


Many special interest groups are involved in the protection of this Amendment as well as the movement that seems to want dissolution of this Amendment. Groups like the National Rifle Association (NRA) and citizens from the Million Mom March (MMM) are some of these groups.


Although the amendment states that infringement will not happen, it seems it already does to an extent. The realm of laws concerning gun ownership is one of the most redundant and extraneous in our legal system. The Pro Gun Control groups like MMM and the Brady Campaign move for what seems like more legislation and gun control while the leading anti-gun control group, NRA fights for what they believe are citizen's rights in accordance with the Bill of Rights.


Who is right and who is wrong? I wish I had the answer. This is a very sensitive issue that dealing with the worst mixture of all…beauracracy and emotions. While researching this paper I came across articles, web sites, opinion polls and other information from both side of this article. It seems to me that the fight is different from both sides. The anti-gun control teams use the backbone of the United States to lay their framework. They constantly recite the Bill of Rights and US Constitution to support their beliefs. The pro-gun control groups rely more on emotions to drive their point home. Is there a right and wrong side? As with many debates, it is hard to justify either at this point. Other tough issues such as Abortion and Flag Burning stir the patriotism and feelings of many Americans. Emotions play a huge role in the decision making process.


The Gun Control movement began in 174 with the establishment of the National Council to Control Handguns (NCCH) by Dr. Mark Borinsky, a victim of gun violence. From there, this issue came to the forefront of the political hotbed. On March 0, 181 Jim Brady, press secretary to President Ronald Reagan, was shot and seriously wounded during an assassination attempt on the President. This sparked the start-up of the Center to Prevent Handgun Violence (CPHV), an educational outreach organization dedicated to reducing gun violence. Sarah Brady, wife of Jim Brady was later named Chair of the CPVH. She has been very productive while serving as Chair and obviously played a key-role in getting support for The Brady Bill, which requires a five-day waiting period and background checks on handgun purchases. President Clinton signed this bill into law after a seven-year battle. As with many interest group issues, these are driven by emotions. People lose a loved one or friend due to gun use and join the fight against guns.


The movement and strength for the pro-gun people is just as strong. The NRA is a very strong, deep-rooted, politically linked group. On November 17, 1871, William Conant Church and George Wood Wingate founded the NRA. Both were Union veterans of the Civil War and advocates of the right to bear arms. Today, the NRA is definitely supported by the Conservative, or right side of Government.


Recent evidence shows that they too are using an emotional agenda to get their point across now. Rather than continuing their one-dimensional outlook to quote the nd Amendment, they have moved for a more emotional stance. Their current campaign shows video clips of elderly women that have been attacked but because they were trained to use guns and had a weapon with them, they were able to fight-off their attackers. This message hits home as well. The NRA preaches safety, training and education as well as constitutional right. They know that the public wants to be safe and the first strike for pro gun control happened in 111 when New York State's Sullivan Law was enacted. This law imposed an exceedingly restrictive handgun-licensing scheme on New York City. The assassination attempt on New York Mayor William Gaynor is what prompted the law. The NRA acted out in an emotional outburst stating that their "Constitutional Right" to bear arms was being diverted.


Will this issue ever be settled? It is hard to say. Unfortunately, for groups that are trying to create greater gun control laws, the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights guarantees the citizens of the United States of America the right to bear arms. Concerning the groups that are against gun control in whole, there will always be a fight against them because the wrong people will always use guns in the wrong way. This long-standing battle has gone on for many years and is expected to continue on for many more. As long as there are people using guns for the wrong reasons, there will be resistance for anti-gun lobbyists. The fact that emotions play such a huge role in this issue continues to add energy to it. It is hard to discount a personal testimony from a grieving mother that is detailing how her child was gunned down in cold blood. But it is also hard to rule against a right that has been engrained in our heritage as Americans.


It seems to me that there are countless gun laws that are not really being enforced. The argument to author and implement "new" laws seems very redundant to me. After looking at various laws that are active, it seems that our government needs to look at a better enforcement plan. The only way to curb violence with guns is to treat gun law violators with stricter sentences. It seems obvious to me. Take for instance the State of California and the Three-strikes Rule. Why not a "No-strikes Rule" or mandatory long prison terms for use of a gun during a crime? We have laws like that but the legal loopholes are many and in today's legal system, a drug dealer usually ends-up doing more time than an armed robbery suspect. It seems to me that the system needs to be smoothed over to ensure citizens benefit. The answers seem to be right in front of us but the value of the decisions that are being made is questionable. We spend millions of dollars attempting to persuade politicians to vote "our" way. The real question is what is right and what is wrong?


Emotions or politics, there is no correct answer.


BIBILIOGRAPHY


Bardes, Barbara and Schmidt, Steffen and Shelley, Mack "American Government and Politics Today The Essentials Clark Baxter, 00.


URLhttp//www.vpc.org/nrainfo/chapter1.html


URLhttp//www.bradycampaign.org/about/index.asp


URLhttp//www.nra.org/


URLhttp//millionmommarch.com/


URLhttp//www.saf.org/


Eisen, Joanne and Gallant, Paul and Kopel, Dave"A World Without Guns" Internet Article located URLhttp//www.nrahq.org/publications/tag/feature1.asp


Please note that this sample paper on 2nd AMMENDENT - Politics or Emotions? is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on 2nd AMMENDENT - Politics or Emotions?, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on 2nd AMMENDENT - Politics or Emotions? will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!


No comments:

Post a Comment